summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md')
-rw-r--r--content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md22
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md b/content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md
index 2a739f4..9fff702 100644
--- a/content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md
+++ b/content/marx/socialism-utopian-and-scientific/index.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
title: "Socialism Utopian and Scientific"
date: 2022-11-28T23:40:03-05:00
-draft: true
+draft: false
author: Frederick Engels
written: Between January and March of 1880
@@ -42,19 +42,19 @@ I am perfectly aware that the contents of this work will meet with objection fro
And, yet, the original home of all modern materialism, from the 17th century onwards, is England.
> "Materialism is the natural-born son of Great Britain. Already the British schoolman, Duns Scotus, asked, 'whether it was impossible for the matter to think?'
-
+>
> "In order to effect this miracle, he took refuge in God's omnipotence — i.e., he made theology preach materialism. Moreover, he was a nominalist. [Nominalism](https://marxists.org/glossary/terms/n/o.htm#nominalism), the first form of materialism, is chiefly found among the English schoolmen.
-
+>
> "The real progenitor of English materialism is Bacon. To him, natural philosophy is the only true philosophy, and physics based upon the experience of the senses is the chiefest part of natural philosophy. Anaxagoras and his homoiomeriae, Democritus and his atoms, he often quotes as his authorities. According to him, the senses are infallible and the source of all knowledge. All science is based on experience, and consists in subjecting the data furnished by the senses to a rational method of investigation. Induction, analysis, comparison, observation, experiment, are the principal forms of such a rational method. Among the qualities inherent in matter, motion is the first and foremost, not only in the form of mechanical and mathematical motion, but chiefly in the form of an impulse, a vital spirit, a tension — or a 'qual', to use a term of Jakob Bohme's [^int-mat2] — of matter.
-
+>
> "In Bacon, its first creator, materialism still occludes within itself the germs of a many-sided development. On the one hand, matter, surrounded by a sensuous, poetic glamor, seems to attract man's whole entity by winning smiles. On the other, the aphoristically formulated doctrine pullulates with inconsistencies imported from theology.
-
+>
> "In its further evolution, materialism becomes one-sided. Hobbes is the man who systematizes Baconian materialism. Knowledge based upon the senses loses its poetic blossom, it passes into the abstract experience of the mathematician; geometry is proclaimed as the queen of sciences. Materialism takes to misanthropy. If it is to overcome its opponent, misanthropic, flashless spiritualism, and that on the latter's own ground, materialism has to chastise its own flesh and turn ascetic. Thus, from a sensual, it passes into an intellectual, entity; but thus, too, it evolves all the consistency, regardless of consequences, characteristic of the intellect.
-
+>
> "Hobbes, as Bacon's continuator, argues thus: if all human knowledge is furnished by the senses, then our concepts and ideas are but the phantoms, divested of their sensual forms, of the real world. Philosophy can but give names to these phantoms. One name may be applied to more than one of them. There may even be names of names. It would imply a contradiction if, on the one hand, we maintained that all ideas had their origin in the world of sensation, and, on the other, that a word was more than a word; that, besides the beings known to us by our senses, beings which are one and all individuals, there existed also beings of a general, not individual, nature. An unbodily substance is the same absurdity as an unbodily body. Body, being, substance, are but different terms for the same reality. *It is impossible to separate thought from matter that thinks.* This matter is the substratum of all changes going on in the world. The word infinite is meaningless, unless it states that our mind is capable of performing an endless process of addition. Only material things being perceptible to us, we cannot know anything about the existence of God. My own existence alone is certain. Every human passion is a mechanical movement, which has a beginning and an end. The objects of impulse are what we call good. Man is subject to the same laws as nature. Power and freedom are identical.
-
+>
> "Hobbes had systematized Bacon, without, however, furnishing a proof for Bacon's fundamental principle, the origin of all human knowledge from the world of sensation. It was Locke who, in his *Essay on the Human Understanding*, supplied this proof.
-
+>
> "Hobbes had shattered the theistic prejudices of Baconian materialism; Collins, Dodwell, Coward, Hartley, Priestley, similarly shattered the last theological bars that still hemmed in Locke's sensationalism. At all events, for practical materialists, Deism is but an easy-going way of getting rid of religion."
*Karl Marx [The Holy Family](#TODO;../../1845/holy-family/index.htm) p. 201 - 204*
@@ -131,10 +131,8 @@ In fact, in England too, the working-people have begun to move again. They are,
But the triumph of the European working-class does not depend upon England alone. It can only be secured by the cooperation of, at least, England, France, and Germany. In both the latter countries, the working-class movement is well ahead of England. In Germany, it is even within measurable distance of success. The progress it has there made during the last 25 years is unparalleled. It advances with ever-increasing velocity. If the German middle-class have shown themselves lamentably deficient in political capacity, discipline, courage, energy, and perseverance, the German working-class have given ample proof of all these qualities. Four hundred years ago, Germany was the starting-point of the first upheaval of the European middle-class; as things are now, is it outside the limits of possibility that Germany will be the scene, too, of the first great victory of the European proletariat?
-**Frederick Engels**
-
-London
-
+**Frederick Engels**\
+London\
April 20, 1892
## I. The Development of Utopian Socialism